|
|
|||||||
AS couple of weeks ago they had a two-day, muzzle loader only, managed hunt at Watkins Mill. They were allowing 85 hunters and each hunter could take 3 does. Now, I am out at Watkins a lot. I often got out there, park, and read my paper. In the last 3 1/2 months I had seen exactly 6 deer. This is for background information only. 72 of the allowable 85 hunters showed up. During that two-day hunt they killed exactly 14 deer. Wait, it gets worse. Two hunters managed to get their 3 deer each. So, those two hunters took 6 of the 14 total deer killed. That means 70 hunters managed to get 8 deer in two days. No one around here can figure why the hunt went on knowing there were so few deer in the park. That blue-tongue-type disease had severely impacted the herd two years ago. No wonder to me that only 14 were taken. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Part of that 'quality hunting experience' |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Sounds like a quiet place to read the paper. Gunshots shouldn't interrupt much. Part of me wants to say what a shame,,,but another part of me wants to say,,,,(don't kill me here) at least they were afforded the opprotunitny,,,,yeah I know it don't make it rite getting folks hopes up,,,,but a slim chance is better than none. Ain't killed a deer for years,,,that's what the young'uns are for,,,,but I spect if I wanted to to it wouldn't be that big of a deal Just like the ole days, ya hungry,,, yer gonna eat. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Quote: Because the MDC is too big to make simple evaluations like that and adjust accordingly. They've become so big and bureaucratic that making a simple decision and adjustment is not possible. The number of meetings, approvals and forms in triplicate would be mind-boggling. It is easier just to have the hunt and pretend nothing ever happened. |