I've developed an immunity to the bullchit parts of stories and focus on the parts that are correct, intensive management of the forests, that way there aren't six to ten times as many trees per acre ready to go up like a tinder box every summer cuz some damn tree hugger got logging ended in the forest. When you have more trees, you have less moisture per tree, which means you got a firestorm waiting to happen by August every year.
The Global Warming, well we know that's bullchit, but you can't reference an article today that doesn't link it to whatever the hell is happening from a hurricane to fires to your damn baby's stinky ass diaper.
Manage the forests, have them logged, and what part of managed keeps people out of them? Don't have huge expanses that are roadless, open access to all the forest and manage the damn things, that way we don't have areas of forest with six to ten times more trees than were there historically, sucking up all the available moisture by June 1 and then sitting in the summer drying up to two and three percent moisture content.
you're leave it all alone is horsechit, that basically what they've been doing and you see how that has worked
now why is it that we keep setting records for wildland fires each successive years, now a jackass would say global warming and go about his day thinking he contributed to society, I would say we've been doing nothing but shutting down lumber mills over the last 20 years and restricting the ability of national forests to be logged, meanwhile the fuels just increase.
But you haven't been out here since we set a record every year for wildland fire acreage, you left when the chit started to get interesting.
Previous
Index
Next
Flat
Re: Forest Fires are for Suckers?like you!
Edit
Reply
Quote
