well while you continue to hate your fellow man since he decided to live near the forest, you might as well expand your hate for your other fellow men who decide to live near the coast or near a river or in an earthquake zone or anywhere else on this earth.
you promote a stupid environmentalist argument, the only difference between you and the committed environmentalist, is you are too stupid to realize what the implications of your argument are. At least an environmentalist will come right out and say it, man is evil and shouldn't be on the planet. That's the logical conclusion of your argument.
and another thing, the forest service goes to point protection when they figure they can't stop a forest fire after about a day or two of initial attack. these articles you post give the impression that all us poor people who decided to live near the forest want them protecting us on our land, it is quite the contrary, we want them taking care of their own land.
you wouldn't know that however, obviously because you are too stupid to look into something for yourself and rely on only liberal media sources, and I've seen enough of your posts to know exactly where you get your information.
so why don't you man up and start telling Los Angeles, Seattle, Portland, Phoenix, Denver and all the other major cities in the west that they shouldn't live there.
And while you are at it, why don't you go to the forest service and tell them you are committed to having them eradicate the forests enough so that people will no longer live near them.
you are a child. you independent thinking never developed and now as an adult you make that point known with your every thought.
Previous
Index
Next
Flat
Re: Clinton Health Plan and crappy looking '08 slate
Edit
Reply
Quote
