you might as well post up just how wrong you are to support socialists, it's obvious you're a damn commie with no answers.
Or more likely a puss who knows his support of the national forests goes against every principle he claimed to stand for on this website.
You've mastered the Democratic argument HB, whatever you do, don't answer the questions, if you start to, be vague and attack your opponent.
You don't live out here and I now know you never lived anywhere near a national forest, you obviously lived in the middle of the damn Oregon desert in the southeast quadrant of the state. You support the government over your fellow citizens and believe in its supremacy to just force people out and off their lands either through fiat or inaction. Either way the results are the same and people's freedoms have been trammeled upon, all the while you support the wilderness act of 1964 that promoted the greatest myth of our time, that somehow man is not a part of nature.
what a jackass, I can't fathom why someone with the beliefs you have demonstrated in the forest debate doesn't just go ahead and believe in the boogey man SUV causing global warming, oh wait, I know you do believe it, you're just scared to admit it here, damn commie liberal
Previous
Index
Next
Flat
Re: Clinton Health Plan and crappy looking '08 slate
Edit
Reply
Quote
