Quote:

---

Paul Dallas said:

Quote:

---

sptsman said:

Flacco is what Bradford can be in the next few years. He's not great but he's very good and can win you a Super Bowl. Give Bradford that O-line and a few receivers and he'll be every bit as good as Flacco.

---

Uh . . . .no. Granted, Boldin and Smith are stud receivers, but Bradford just lacks intensity and coolness in the clutch.

---

Complete BS... He lacks an O-line, receivers and continuity with and offense (3 O-coordinators in 3 years). Questioning his intensity and coolness is just garbage. How cool can you be on your back, because your O-line can't protect you and your receivers are incapable of getting open? Considering his lack of weapons, a new offense every year and all of the other factors, it's a miracle he's ranked in the middle of the pack statistically. I'd say he's likely better than Flacco. But we may never know, if the Rams continue to Bulger-ize him...

I saw John Harbaugh working the suits during the blackout. That was a lot different thant the whining about the no-call, at the end of the game. But you may be right. Had the Ravens gone on to lose that game, he may have cried tears just as big. The difference is that I don't dislike him as much...

--------------------
"Hunts are best measured by the endurance of the memories they produce..."

Post Extras